Make sustainability science a cumulative effort!

The work life of a researcher working sustainable development can be frustrating at times, owing to widespread pay-wall publishing, poor data reporting practices, and in parts low standards for conducting sound and reproducible research.

Still today, too many doctoral candidates start their work with an empty Excel workbook and not much else, and this ‘start from scratch’ recurs with every new generation of young researchers.

These widespread research practices are barriers to knowledge accumulation and slow down progress. For many published claims, the raw data, software used, and sometimes even basic assumptions such as system boundary choices (which processes and effects are included in a study and which are not) are not well documented, e.g., in life cycle assessment. Intermediate results are not reported, which means that often, other researchers cannot connect to existing knowledge. Consequently, a large body of repetitive research, incompatible datasets, and opaque modelling tools have accumulated over the last decades. Some of the data generated and tools developed cannot be improved or reused. Hence, the published works do not contribute to a cumulative body of scientific knowledge, and there is a danger that our work loses relevance and gradually turns into busy work. The prevalence of limited consultancy-type funding, the tendency to publish in small units and the recurrence of short project time frames mute incentives for cumulative data compilation and refinement as well as development of transparent methodology. If not overcome, the above-listed barriers to knowledge accumulation in the participating disciplines will curtail the impact of sustainable development research.

The lack of incentives for cumulative research in science for sustainable development has been bothering me for a few years now, and it is mainly our own responsibility to rethink our workflow and boost knowledge accumulation. While all actors involved, from funders to publishers, can facilitate knowledge accumulation, I believe that the main responsibility lies with us researchers and with the research associations and societies, in particular.

I put my thoughts and proposed solutions to the knowledge accumulation problem into a comment piece on the future development of sustainability science, newly published in Nature Sustainability ( There, I list the required measures and infrastructure needs for cumulative sustainability science as well as the different responsibilities for fostering knowledge accumulation.

The solutions to the structural problems of sustainability science need to be community-driven, while securing stakeholder support is needed to bring about resilient structural change. Different processes need to be installed within science for sustainable development (Figure, inner circle) and several important exogenous determinants of a transition to more cumulative research need to be taken into account (Figure, outer circle).

We need a change in research culture to make cumulative science the new normal and embrace the new workflows resulting from the adoption of cumulative research strategies.

I hope you will find the time to have a look at the measures proposed in the comment and that you will join the process of improving sustainability science!

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Sustainability Community, please sign in

Go to the profile of Maria Spiliotopoulou
about 4 years ago

Thank you for this very useful Commentary. As a sustainability researcher, I share your concerns and appreciate your thoughts. I can't help but notice, however, that your article is published behind a pay-wall and I can't access it (I read the first page only); kind of ironic isn't it?

Go to the profile of Stefan Pauliuk
about 4 years ago

Dear Maria,

thank you for your interest in this work! In this case, I needed to balance the visibility offered by NatSust with the wish to have it openly accessible, and went for the former.

I don't even have access myself, as our uni understandably doesn't want to pay the ca. 4000 EUR/yr subscription fee for every new journal that Springer-Nature invents.

Everyone, just send an email to

and I will legally share a copy with you.

Best regards,


Go to the profile of Maria Spiliotopoulou
about 4 years ago

Hello Stefan, 

This is completely understandable; although Nature is a reputable publication, my university isn't keen on paying for all these journals either. 

Your offer is highly appreciated, I will email you.

Thank you,